Ready to review
Enough official evidence is available for a meaningful research review.
Trust methodology
How evidence is handled
SIF profiles use one public status system: Evidence sufficient for review, Needs verification, and Early coverage.
Needs verification
The profile is useful, but one or more important evidence items still need checking.
Early coverage
The profile is included for awareness, but evidence is still too limited for deeper reliance.
Principle
Evidence before polish
A polished profile still needs clear evidence. Each page should show what can be reviewed now and what still needs checking.
Review SIF pagesEvidence registry
What each profile tracks
Each SIF page tracks the AMC page, AMFI disclosures, offer document, factsheet, NAV source, portfolio disclosure, and risk or suitability evidence. Those inputs map into the three public review states.
Coverage
Why coverage is curated
elitefunds currently tracks a reviewed seed universe of SIF records so each profile can carry source, NAV, evidence, and research context. The next data phase is official-source expansion across AMFI and AMC disclosures.
Build the official SIF universe collection sheet from AMFI SIF scheme details and AMC pages.
Group candidate SIFs by AMC, category, launch status, and available source slots.
Add records in small review batches so evidence quality does not fall behind coverage.
Promote profiles to public only after NAV freshness and document evidence are labelled.
Profile gate
A SIF can appear once official scheme identity is clear. It becomes more useful as NAV, documents, portfolio disclosure, and risk evidence are captured and labelled.
NAV updates
Validate every scheduled refresh
elitefunds runs scheduled official end-of-day AMFI NAV refreshes. A row appears publicly only when its scheme identity, plan, option, value, date, and source mapping pass the data checks. Factsheet NAV remains a separate dated reference.
Identity, freshness, or parsing errors block the affected NAV row.
Previously reviewed rows can continue while an unreviewed new row is held for mapping.
Factsheet NAV is never promoted as a current daily value.
Limits
What not to assume
The site can be useful before every source is automated, but gaps must stay visible.
NAV freshness is tracked per strategy; a stale, missing, or newly introduced row must not be treated as current.
Portfolio disclosures are periodic snapshots and may be older than the latest NAV observation.
A checked source link does not mean every value inside that document has been independently verified.
SIF research notes and launch-tracker rows are informational and should be checked against current official documents.
Candidate and launched-gap rows remain watchlist items until identity, launch state, and applicable NAV evidence are reviewed.
How to use it
Use the site without over-relying on it
Read
Start with learning guides to understand the wrapper and strategy.
Inspect
Open the SIF profile and check status, NAV freshness, and documents.
Compare
Use comparison as a shortlist aid, not a recommendation engine.
Verify
Read official documents and speak to a qualified advisor before acting.
Evidence sufficient for review
Enough evidence is available for a meaningful research review, not a suitability decision.
Needs verification
Useful profile, but one or more important evidence items still need checking.
Early coverage
Included for awareness, but evidence is still limited.
How to read status
Status is not a performance rating
Use it before comparison
A profile with evidence sufficient for review is easier to evaluate than one with unresolved NAV or document gaps.
Do not treat it as advice
A stronger status does not mean the SIF is suitable, lower risk, or expected to perform better.
Check the next gap
The next source gap tells users what evidence is still missing before deeper reliance.